Friday, May 2, 2025

Abuja-Kaduna train attack: ECOWAS Court dismisses SERAP’s N50m compensation suit

Must read

Ibrahim Ramalan
Ibrahim Ramalan
Ibrahim Ramalan is a graduate of Mass Communications from the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) Zaria. With nearly a decade-long, active journalism practice, Mr Ramalan has been able to rise from a cub reporter to the exalted position of an editor; first as Arts Editor with the Blueprint Newspapers before resigning in 2019; second and presently as an Associate Editor of the Daily Nigerian online newspaper. He can be reached via ibroramalan@gmail.com, or www.facebook.com/ibrahim.ramalana, or @McRamalan on Twitter.
- Advertisement -
tiamin rice
tiamin rice

The ECOWAS Court of Justice on Thursday dismissed a suit filed by Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, seeking N50 million compensation from Nigeria for each Abuja-Kaduna train attack victim.

Terrorists had in March, 2022, bombed an Abuja-Kaduna rail line near Rigasa, Kaduna, and attacked over 970 passengers onboard, resulting in fatalities, injuries, and abductions.

Delivering judgment, the court held that SERAP’s claims were inadmissible because they failed to meet the ‘victim status’ requirement essential for litigation under Article 10(d) of the same Protocol.

tiamin rice

Justice Dupe Atoki, who delivered the judgement, said that athough SERAP claimed to be acting in the public interest, the suit lacked ‘victim status’, which is required for public interest litigation.

READ ALSO:   Kaduna 2023: Uba Sani declares intention to succeed El-Rufai

“The court recognises its jurisdiction to hear the case as it involved potential human rights violations within a member state, in accordance with Article 9(4) of the ECOWAS Supplementary Protocol.

whatsApp

“However, the court determines that the case does not meet the criteria for a public interest action, or actio popularis, which requires that the alleged violations affect a large, indeterminate segment of the public or the general public itself.

“The victims of the March 28 attack were identifiable individuals rather than an indeterminate public group, making the claim unsuitable as a public interest litigation,” the Community Court ruled.

The court further held that the reliefs sought by the claimants, including specific monetary compensation, should have been directed at the identifiable victims of the attack, rather than the public at large.

READ ALSO:   Kaduna govt seals 6 telecom masts over N5.8bn unpaid taxes

NAN reports that no fewer than 150 victims of the incident are still unaccounted for.

The three-member panel also comprised of Justice Ricardo Gonçalves (presiding) and Justice Sengu Koroma (member).
NAN

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

- Advertisement -