Saturday, May 3, 2025

Alleged N23.3bn fraud: ONSA’s operations always covert, EFCC witness tells court

Must read

Ibrahim Ramalan
Ibrahim Ramalan
Ibrahim Ramalan is a graduate of Mass Communications from the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) Zaria. With nearly a decade-long, active journalism practice, Mr Ramalan has been able to rise from a cub reporter to the exalted position of an editor; first as Arts Editor with the Blueprint Newspapers before resigning in 2019; second and presently as an Associate Editor of the Daily Nigerian online newspaper. He can be reached via ibroramalan@gmail.com, or www.facebook.com/ibrahim.ramalana, or @McRamalan on Twitter.
- Advertisement -
tiamin rice
tiamin rice

Aliyu Mukadas, a witness in the trial of ex-Minister of State for Finance, Amb. Bashir Yuguda and four others, on Monday, told an FCT High Court, Maitama, that the operations of the Office of the National Security Adviser, ONSA, were always covert.

Other defendants in the trial are retired Col. Sambo Dasuki ex-National Security Adviser, NSA, former governor of Sokoto State, Attahiru Bafarawa, his son, Sagir, and their company, Dalhatu Investment Limited.

The former finance minister and four others are being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on an amended 25-count charge bordering on alleged misappropriation of N23.3billion.

tiamin rice

At the resumed sitting, the EFCC witness, Mukadas, (PW1), told the court under cross-examination by counsel to Bafarawa and his son, Professor J. O. Olatoke (SAN), said ONSA’s operations were covert for security reasons.

READ ALSO:   High chances for Mnangagwa as Zimbabwe goes to polls

According to the PW1, who is a payment manager with the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, the operation of ONSA’s accounts with the apex bank was in the exclusive domain of the account holder.

He informed the court that though he was not a signature expert, it was only Dasuki and one S.A Salisu that signed the documents and presented the same for payment through their representatives.

Mr Mukadas added that he was not aware of the office of a procurement officer in government parastatals.

PW1 also added that he was not the officer involved in the transaction that led to the case against the defendants.

READ ALSO:   Criminals planning to attack Nigerian airports, FAAN raises alarm

According to him, notwithstanding the fact that the ongoing case was instituted by EFCC in December 2015, he was only invited by the EFCC to give a statement on March 31, 2016, because he was a desk officer.

whatsApp

When Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), Counsel to the 5th defendant, Dalhatu Investment Ltd, asked what his schedule of duty was, the witness told the court that he only effected payment when contracts had been executed.

“For security reasons, they always find a name for such contracts,” the EFCC witness told the court.

Justice Yusuf Halilu later adjourned the matter until May 17 at the request of the prosecution counsel, Oluwaleke Atolagbe.

READ ALSO:   COVID-19: January will be tough for Nigerians – NCDC

EFCC had arraigned the defendants first before Justice Peter Affen, now of the Court of Appeal, on Dec. 24, 2015.

The matter was later transferred to Justice Hussein Baba-Yusuf, now the FCT Chief Judge in October, 2016.

The case could not take off since it was first brought to court largely due to the detention of the former NSA by the State Security Service, SSS.

On May, 24, 2022, the defendants were re-arraigned before Justice Yusuf Halilu on an amended 25-count -charge bordering on misappropriation, criminal breach of trust and receiving stolen property.

They all, however, pleaded not guilty when the charges were read to them.

NAN

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

- Advertisement -