Tuesday, May 18, 2021
Array

Charges against CJN not tenable – Lawyer

Headline

Rayyan Alhassan
Rayyan Alhassanhttps://dailynigerian.com/author/rayyan/
Rayyan Alhassan is a 30-year-old graduate of Journalism and Mass Communication at Sikkim Manipal University, Ghana. He is the acting Managing Editor at the Daily Nigerian newspaper, a position he has held for the past 3 years. He can be reached via [email protected], or www.facebook.com/RayyanAlhassan, or @Rayyan88 on Twitter.
tiamin rice

Realwan Okpanachi, a senior lawyer in the FCT, says that the charges against the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Walter Onnoghen, at the Code of Conduct Tribunal, are not tenable.

Mr Okpanachi said his contention was based on the provisions of sections 292(1a)(i) and 292(1b) of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended.

The senior lawyer made this known in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria, NAN, on Friday in Abuja.

READ ALSO: ‘CJN’s arraignment will change attitude, perception to rule of law’

The lawyer also made reference to the subsisting decision of the Court of Appeal in Nganjiwa vs FRN (2017) LPELR-43391 case.

READ  2019: INEC to create more voting points –REC
READ  Supreme Court strikes out ex-CJN Onnoghen’s appeal

Recall that Justice Hyeladzira Nganjiwa had appealed the decision of the High Court of Lagos State in 2017, challenging the jurisdiction of the Court to entertain and determine the instant information against her.

Mr Nganjiwa was by a 14-Count information charged for offences ranging from unlawful enrichment by a public officer to making false information.

NAN also recalls that the Code of Conduct Bureau, CCB, had filed a six-count criminal charge bordering on alleged refusal to declare assets and operating foreign bank accounts, against the CJN.

Mr Okpanachi said that the Code of Conduct Tribunal could have the jurisdiction to try the CJN based on the fact that he was neither above the law, nor entitled to immunity.

READ  NJC queries Onnoghen, Mohammed

“But the jurisdiction of the tribunal has not been effectively activated because the conditions for its innovation, as laid down in the above court of Appeal decision, have not been satisfied.

“In as much as I do not agree with the said decision, it is a binding and subsisting decision which must be respected by every person and authority,’’ Okpanachi said.

He maintained that the issue at stake was not about the merit of the charges against the CJN, but about the rule of law.

READ  Lagos govt receives 1,000 land grabbing petitions in 1 year

“That is, the binding of the subsisting judgment of the Court of Appeal, stating unequivocally that a serving judicial officer cannot be arraigned or tried in any court for a criminal offence.

READ  CCT reserves ruling as Saraki asks tribunal to dismiss charges of false assets declaration

“Not until such officer has been investigated, dismissed or recommended for trial by the National Judicial Council,’’ the lawyer said.

He further said that the lawyers who filed the charges did so in total ignorance for the constitutional provisions and the Court of Appeal judgment in Nganjiwa’s case.

“In view of the above, I humbly advise the Code of Conduct Bureau and the Attorney General of the Federation to withdraw the charges and apologise for their error of judgment,’’ Mr Okpanachi said.

NAN

Related News

Latest News

cosgrove