Poland arrests 2 Huawei workers over spying allegations

Poland has arrested a Chinese employee of Huawei and a Polish national involved in cyber business on allegations of spying, Polish media reported on Friday.

The arrest is considered as deepening the controversy over Western criticism of the Chinese telecoms equipment maker.

U.S. intelligence agencies alleged that Huawei Technologies Co Ltd [HWT.UL] is linked to China’s government and that its equipment could contain “backdoors” for use by government spies.

READ ALSO: $500m Chinese loan: No reason to panic, says DMO

No evidence has been produced publicly and the firm has repeatedly denied the claims.

However, the criticism has led several Western countries and companies to look into whether they should allow Huawei’s equipment to be used in their telecoms networks, straining relations with Beijing.

Polish public TV channel TVP said security services had searched the local offices of Huawei and the offices of telecoms firm Orange Polska (OPL.WA) (ORAN.PA), where it said the Polish national works.

READ ALSO: Chinese phone maker Huawei denies collecting Facebook user data

China’s foreign ministry said it was greatly concerned by the reports and urged Poland to handle the case justly.

“We are aware of the situation and we are looking into it,” Huawei said in a statement.

“We have no comment for the time being.

READ ALSO: Senegal beat Poland for first African win at 2018 World Cup

“Huawei complies with all applicable laws and regulations in the countries where it operates and we require every employee to abide by the laws and regulations in the countries where they are based.”

Orange Polska said the security agency had on Tuesday gathered materials related to an employee, whom it did not identify.

The company added it did not know if the investigation was linked to the employee’s professional work and that it would continue to cooperate with the authorities.

TVP said the security services also searched the offices of Poland’s telecoms regulator, the Office of Electronic Communications, however, the regulator denied this.