Saturday, May 3, 2025

Controversy as Buhari nominates Aisha Umar as PenCom DG

Must read

Rayyan Alhassan
Rayyan Alhassanhttps://dailynigerian.com/author/rayyan/
Rayyan Alhassan is a graduate of Journalism and Mass Communication at Sikkim Manipal University, Ghana. He is the acting Managing Editor at the Daily Nigerian newspaper, a position he has held for the past 3 years. He can be reached via rayyanalhassan@dailynigerian.com, or www.facebook.com/RayyanAlhassan, or @Rayyan88 on Twitter.
- Advertisement -
tiamin rice
tiamin rice

There is a seeming controversy brewing following President Muhammadu Buhari’s nomination of Aisha Dahiru-Umar for the position of the Director-General of the National Pension Commission, PenCom.

DAILY NIGERIAN reports that Mrs Umar is currently the acting Director-General of the commission.

Mr Buhari had transmitted a letter to the Senate on Tuesday seeking confirmation of Mrs Umar as the substantive head of the commission when Oyindasola Oni as the chairman of the governing board.

tiamin rice

But when the Senate President Ahmad Lawan read the President’s letter during plenary on Wednesday, the Senate Minority Leader, Enyinnaya Abaribe kicked against the nomination, saying that it was in breach of the PenCom Act.

Raising a point of order, Mr Abaribe insisted that Mrs Umar who is from the Northeast could not replace former Director-General Chinelo Anohu-Amazu who is from Southeast.

According to him, Mrs Anohu-Amazu’s replace must come from the South East.

He said that the Commission’s Act 2014 stipulates that “in the event of a vacancy, the president shall appoint a replacement from the geo-political zone of the immediate past member that vacated office to complete the remaining tenure.”

“I recall that the tenure of the incumbent was truncated therefore, the new letter from the president that has now moved the chairman of the Commission to another zone may not be correct because it is against the law setting up the National Pension Commission.

“Before you send it to the appropriate committee tomorrow, I wish to draw the attention of the committee to it.”

READ ALSO:   We’ll pass 2020 budget November 28 – Senate President

Responding, Mr Lawan said: “If there is any petition to that effect it should be sent to the committee.”

whatsApp

Meanwhile, s senior official in the pension industry, who spoke with The Nation on condition of anonymity, stated that Mr Buhari’s nomination is back up by the PRA 2014.

The source said the nomination is in furtherance to Section 20 (1) and Section 21 (1) and (2) of the Act, Section 106(4) of the PRA 2014 provides that notwithstanding section 19(2)(a) and 26(2)&(4) of the Act, where a Board of the Commission is yet to be reconstituted after six months of the dissolution of the last board, the president of Nigeria may appoint fit and proper persons with pension cognate experience to constitute the board at the first instance, subject to confirmation by the Senate.

Also, Section 171 of the Constitution of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) vests in Mr. President the power to appoint persons to hold or act in certain offices and to remove such persons. These offices include heads of all Federal Government extra-ministerial departments, howsoever designated.

He stated that the Act did not define what constitutes ‘vacancy’, a situation that created ambiguity as to the exact occasion when Section 21(2) of the PRA 2014 becomes operational.

He said: “However, it will appear from the context that the subsection contemplates the ceazation of membership of the board through any of the scenarios listed in Section 21(1)(a) -(h) of the PRA 2014, which include resignation, death, bankruptcy, conviction of a felony, removal by the President, among others.

READ ALSO:   Buhari to submit ministerial list this week – Senate President

“The argument, therefore, is that Mrs. Amazu’s replacement as DG of PenCom must come from the Southeast zone to complete here remaining term. However, contrary to this submission, a careful review of the relevant provisions of the PRA 2014 would lead to the following conclusions:

“A reading of both subsections (1) & (2) of Section 21 of the PRA 2014 indicates that they consistently use singular phrases such as ‘a member’; ‘a vacancy’; ‘a replacement’; ‘immediate past member that vacated office’ etc. Accordingly, it is submitted that the correct interpretation of Section 21(2) of the PRA 2014 is to hold that it addresses only cases of occasional vacancies created by the exit of individual members of the board of PenCom as enumerated in subsection (1) of the same section, rather than where the whole board is dissolved or all executive management are removed by Mr. President. Section 21(2) of the PRA 2014 seeks to ensure compliance with the provision of Section 19(4) of the Act, which requires that at all times, the Chairman, Director General and four Commissioners of PenCom shall each represent each of the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria.

READ ALSO:   N2.5bn judgment debt: ABU, 110 staff members’ settlement meeting ends in deadlock

“There had been a precedent which illustrates the application of a similar provision under the defunct PRA 2004. Thus, in 2006 when the then President Obasanjo removed only the Chairman of PenCom, Mr. Fola Adeola, who was from the Southwest, his replacement came from the Southwest when late Chief Wole Adeosun was appointed to complete the term started by Mr. Fola Adeola. The provision of Section 21(2) of the PRA 2014 applies not only to the office of the Director General but also the Chairman and other four Commissioners of PenCom where the respective individuals vacate office leaving others in office.

“Without prejudice to the foregoing submissions, we would like to draw attention to the overarching provision of S. 171(2) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), which gives the president unfettered powers to appoint or remove head of any Federal Government the extra-ministerial department, howsoever called.

“This includes appointments to the office of the Director General of PenCom. This constitutional power cannot be eroded by any Act of parliament in the light of the provision of S. 1(3) of the Constitution which provides that “if any other law is inconsistent with the provision of this Constitution, this Constitution shall prevail, and that other law shall to the extent of the inconsistency be void,” he added.

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

- Advertisement -